Ten Years of Uninterrupted Debate: The #auspol Hashtag Community, 2014-2023
1.
CRICOS No.00213J
Ten Yearsof Uninterrupted Debate:
The #auspol Hashtag Community,
2014-2023
Axel Bruns and Anand Badola
Digital Media Research Centre
Queensland University of Technology
Brisbane, Australia
a.bruns@qut.edu.au
@snurb_dot_info | Mastodon: @snurb@aoir.social | Bluesky: @snurb.info
CRICOS No.00213J
Introducing #auspol
•Hashtag. Community?
• Amongst the biggest and most persistent hashtags in Australia
• December 2013 to July 2023: 57m tweets, 1.25m unique accounts
• Strong core of highly active accounts: 44.6m tweets (78%) by top 1% most
active accounts
Indicative of genuine community structures?
• Dataset:
• Continuous data collection (TCAT, TweetQuery, Academic API )
🪦
• Focus on top 1% of accounts by tweet count (12,452 unique accounts) /
top 0.1% of accounts (1,236 unique accounts)
(https://www.smh.com.au/technology/tony-abbott-dismisses-social-media-as-electronic-graffiti-again-20150126-12yg26.html)
CRICOS No.00213J
(Images: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-01-29/tony-abbott-eats-an-onion/103394716;https://www.gq.com.au/success/career/our-exclusive-interview-with-malcolm-turnbull/news-story/abdba2bbf5fc5e182ec720b5938ef8d2; https://independentaustralia.net/politics/politics-display/scott-morrisons-not-so-good-year-of-2020,14632; https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/article/2024/jul/11/anthony-albanese-appeals-to-western-sydney-amid-muslim-voting-campaigns-on-gaza-war)
Morrison’s appointment as PM
to start of 2019 election campaign:
Organised agitation against Morrison,
later moving from #auspol to #ausvotes?
federal
election
2016
federal
election
2019
federal
election
2022
enXittification
🤬
Voice referendum
campaign?
CRICOS No.00213J
• Assessingsimilarities between accounts in:
• @mentioning
• Retweeting
• Secondary (non-#auspol) hashtag use
• Domain sharing
• Top 1% accounts, further filtered for:
• Accounts engaging in all four practices
• At least 100 domains, 1000 hashtags,
1000 retweets, 500 @mentions posted
Practice Mapping
Image: Midjourney
CRICOS No.00213J
Finding Community
•What makes participants central to a community?
• Engagement: addressing and responding to other participants through @mentions
• Balance between number of sent @mention and received @mention tweets
• Balance between number of accounts @mentioned and accounts @mentioning
• Consistency: maintaining such balance even while posting a lot of @mentions
• Operationalisation:
• Engagement – Sent-Received Indices:
• Tweets: (# sent @mentions - # received @mentions) / (# sent @mentions + # received @mentions)
• Accounts: (# @mentioned accounts - # @mentioning accounts) / (# @mentioned accounts + # @mentioning accounts)
+1 (@mentioning without any response) 0 (balanced) -1 (not responding to @mentions)
• Posting volume:
• Consistency – Balanced Mention Tweets: # total @mentions × (1 - | Sent-Received Index for Tweets |)
18.
CRICOS No.00213J
Finding Community
•#auspol patterns:
• Sent-Received Indices for tweets and
accounts largely move together
• Consistency highest for 0.1% group
• Key groups emerge:
• Institutional accounts: many @mentions
received, but very little reciprocal
engagement
• Peripheral participants: many attempts
to engage, but few responses received
• In-group cliques: very actively
@mentioning, but selective engagement
with a subset of accounts
• Community core: broadly balanced
engagement (slightly more sent than
received)
Lots of @mentions
sent, few responses
received
Lots of @mentions
received, few
responses sent
Many outgoing
@mentions, but only
to a few accounts
Many accounts
@mentioned, but
engaging with few
responses
News,
journalists,
politicians
Peripheral
participants
Rare –
automated /
procedural?
Rare –
spammers?
Community
core
19.
CRICOS No.00213J
Finding Community
•#auspol patterns:
• Sent-Received Indices for tweets and
accounts largely move together
• Consistency highest for 0.1% group
• Key groups emerge:
• Institutional accounts: many @mentions
received, but very little reciprocal
engagement
• Peripheral participants: many attempts
to engage, but few responses received
• In-group cliques: very actively
@mentioning, but selective engagement
with a subset of accounts
• Community core: broadly balanced
engagement (slightly more sent than
received)
CRICOS No.00213J
Observations andOutlook
• Community evolution:
• Strongly committed and very active core of participants
• Genuine community – highly interconnected and interactive
• Gradual churn in community core
• Especially pronounced as PM Morrison comes to power, declining after 2022 election
– indicative of orchestrated opposition campaign? Or genuine reaction to Morrison’s style of politics?
• Next steps:
• Further analysis of evolution in themes and topics over the years
• Practice mapping analysis for selected periods during the ten-year timespan
• Changes in toxicity and other indicators of communicative dysfunction
• Information sourcing and sharing practices (reliable URL data available from Aug. 2016)
MON2FEB- FRI6FEB2025
QUTKELVINGROVECAMPUS
2026
SUMMER
SCHOOL
DIGITAL MEDIARESEARCH CENTRE
Register now to
attend the
Open to research students in Master or Doctorate programs, as
well as to early career researchers. Join us for a week of inspiring
and thought-provoking training by world-leading DMRC
researchers.
The Summer School focusses on theories, approaches, methods
and digital research skills, and will allow you to build career-long
connections with digital media researchers from around the
world. Delegate registrations open on Monday
13th October
. Please formally register to
attendbynolaterthan5pm AESTFriday
19December2025.
24.
CRICOS No.00213J
This researchis supported by the Australian Research Council through the
Australian Laureate Fellowship project Determining the Dynamics of
Partisanship and Polarisation in Online Public Debate and the Australian Future
Fellowship Understanding Intermedia Information Flows in the Australian Online
Public Sphere.
Acknowledgments